State v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 1975
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Johnson v. Zerbst · Escobedo v. Illinois · Jackson v. Denno · Fay v. Noia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Q. (By Mr. Welker) Are you willing that this whole record in this statement that you made up there at Sikeston be given to the jury? A. Yes, sir. MR. HUNTER, JR.: I object to that for the very reason he has nothing to say about it. The State will introduce it at its own time and it’s the State’s exhibit. THE COURT: That’s right. His counsel said yesterday that he was perfectly willing that the whole thing be read. MR. HUNTER, JR.: Yes, sir, and it shall be done.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gray v. Swenson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.