Pendleton v. Burkhalter’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2012
4 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 54 Tex. Civ. App. 269 - Gold v. Campbell · Raleigh & Heidenheimer Bros. v. Cook · JC Penney Company v. Gilford · Reed v. Lindley · Suhre v. Kott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the existence of such facts and circumstances as would excite the belief, in a reasonable mind, acting on the facts within the knowledge of the prosecutor, that the person charged was guilty of the crime for which he was prosecuted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.