Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 432 U.S. 161 - Brown v. Ohio

Brown v. Ohio’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

6,271
cited by 6,271 later decisions
97
cited 97 times by the Supreme Court
49
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

1,568 federal appellate · 200 district · 3,608 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6,271 later decisions (97 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2026 · most notably Missouri v. Hunter (1983), United States v. Dixon (1993)

1,568 federal appellate · 200 district · 3,608 state decisions — followed in 49 states

2.2k0197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Ashe v. Swenson · Green v. United States

Cited together with Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Iannelli v. United States · Ashe v. Swenson · Whalen v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6,271 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “protects against a second prosecution for the same offense after acquittal. It protects against a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction. And it protects against multiple punishments for the same offense.”
    303 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The applicable rule is that where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not.”
    126 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The Double Jeopardy Clause is not such a fragile guarantee that prosecutors can avoid its limitations by the simple expedient of dividing a single crime into a series of temporal or spatial units.”
    54 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.