State v. Ayers’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2017
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Bruton v. United States · Rhode Island v. Innis · Michigan v. Mosley · Castor v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“3. A person is an accomplice of another person in the commission of a crime if: A. With the intent of promoting or facilitating the commission of the crime, he solicits such other person to commit the crime, or aids or agrees to aid or attempts to aid such other person in planning or committing the crime. A person is an accomplice under this subsection to any crime the commission of which was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of his conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bowman“[although some courts have required, strictly, that a person in custody be informed specifically of his right to the presence of an attorney during questioning, we regard as better reasoned those cases holding that Miranda ... is directed to insuring that the substance of the constitutional rights of a person in custody be intelligibly conveyed to him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Figueroa“violation of [suspect's] constitutional rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hartley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.