Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 433 A.2d 757 - Roche v. Egan

Roche v. Egan’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
10
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 4 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2016 · most notably 42 Cal. 4th 278 - Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training v. Superior Court (2007), Godbehere v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. (1989)

1 federal appellate · 4 district · 16 state decisions — followed in 10 states

1001981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · St. Amant v. Thompson · Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts · Garrison v. State of Louisiana · Houltin v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Law enforcement is a uniquely governmental affair. The police detective, as one charged with investigating crimes and arresting the criminal, is in fact, and also is generally known to be, vested with substantial responsibility for the safety and welfare of the citizenry in areas impinging most directly and intimately on daily living: the home, the place of work and of recreation, the sidewalks and streets. The nature and extent of the responsibility of a police detective is punctuated by the fact that a firearm, no less than a badge, comes with his office.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.