Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 433 F.2d 415 - United States v. Jaskiewicz

United States v. Jaskiewicz’s Empirical Analysis

433 F.2d 415 · 1970

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 1997
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1997 · most notably Beckwith v. United States (1976), Commonwealth v. Chacko (1983)

22 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

300197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Stovall v. Denno · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Hoffa v. United States · Garrity v. State of New Jersey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In short, the decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , * * * (1966), does not require that this court in this case depart from its pre-Miranda rule that the sole test for admissibility of a taxpayer’s statements to agents of the Treasury Department is the voluntariness of the statements. United States v. Frank, 245 F.2d 284 [51 AFTR 537] (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 819 , *** (1957); United States v. Burdick, 214 F.2d 768, 773 [45 AFTR 1823] (3 Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 831 , * * * (1955). [Fn. ref. omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “There * * * [is] no affirmative duty on the part of the Government to disclose to * * * [the taxpayer] the extent and nature of * * * [the] investigation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “government has in some meaningful way imposed restraint on [a person's] freedom of action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.