Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 433 F.2d 680 - United States v. Berger

United States v. Berger’s Empirical Analysis

433 F.2d 680 · 1970

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
November 1982
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1954 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Sherman v. United States · Frazier v. Cupp · Corallo v. United States · Schaffer v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An act is done knowingly if it is done voluntarily and purposely and not because of mistake, accident, mere negligence or some other innocent reason. An act is done willfully if it is done knowingly and deliberately. Willful does not mean that the defendant in addition to knowing what he is doing must also suppose he is breaking the law. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. I reiterate, however, that in order to convict a defendant of conspiracy he must have knowledge of some of its purposes and he must act with the intent of accomplishing the objectives of the conspiracy.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[Ajdduce some evidence that a government agent by initiating the illegal conduct himself induced the defendant to commit the offense. If you find that the defendant * * * has adduced such evidence then the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the inducement was not the cause of the crime, that is, that the defendant * * * was ready and willing to commit the offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.