Munn v. Toney’s Empirical Analysis
433 F.3d 1087 · 2006
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2024
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. District of Columbia · Harris v. United States · Focus Media, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co. · Royal v. Kautzky · Randle v. Parker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o Federal civil action may be brought by a prisoner confined in a jail, prison, or other correctional facility, for mental or emotional injury suffered while in custody without a prior showing of physical injury or the commission of a sexual act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McAdoo v. Martin“[S]ection 1997e(e) is merely a limitation on damages....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McAdoo v. Martin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.