New York State Law Officers Union v. Andreucci’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably McANANEY v. ASTORIA FINANCIAL CORP. (2009), 464 F. Supp. 2d 191 - Command Cinema Corp. v. VCA Labs, Inc. (2006)
5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers · Charles Morris v. Ann Lindau · Ezekwo v. NYC Health & Hospitals Corp. · Lynn Gorman-Bakos v. Cornell Cooperative
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“presided over meetings with State entities and other unions, assisted in organizing new workers and in preparing for various arbitration proceedings, engaged in legislative affairs, and generally ‘was responsible for the overall daily [union] activities.’ By contrast, once Hoyt’s leave was revoked, he had to report for duty at the Albany County jail and work as the booking officer in the Admissions and Discharge unit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Where, as here, the meaning of a particular contractual provision is ambiguous and the intent of the parties cannot be determined from the contractual language itself, the ambiguity presents a question of fact to be resolved by a jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]hen the meaning of the contract is ambiguous and the intent of the parties becomes a matter of inquiry, a question of fact is presented which cannot be resolved on a motion for summary judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.