Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

433 F. App'x 150

Ray v. Driver

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided June 1, 2011

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2011-06-01

Relies on Houston v. Lack

Decided 2011-06-01

¶1 Remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3 Kenneth William Ray, II, seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment, and dismissing Ray’s complaint. The notice of appeal was received in the district court shortly after expiration of the appeal period. Because Ray is incarcerated, the notice is considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). The record does not reveal when Ray gave the notice of appeal to prison officials for mailing. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to obtain this information from the parties and to determine whether the filing was timely under Fed. R.App. P. 4(c)(1) and Houston v. Lack. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

¶4 REMANDED.

/433/fappx/150 · .json · Public domain