United States v. Noble’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Schmerber v. State of California · United States v. Arvizu · United States v. Dionisio · Arizona v. Hicks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]ourts have erred on the side of applying the Schmerber balancing test to requests for saliva samples even though, technically, procedures to collect such samples entail no intrusion beneath the skin”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the government (whether ex post or ex ante) bears the burden of demonstrating the requisite probable cause or, at the least, reasonable suspicion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.