433 F. Supp. 2d 58 - Rasul v. Rumsfeld’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 33 U.S.C. § 901 · 42 U.S.C. § 1651 (Defense Base Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000B · 42 U.S.C. § 2000C
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Anderson v. Creighton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Guantanamo Bay is in every practical respect a United States territory....”). As noted, Boumediene is currently before the Supreme Court on certiorari review. 19 . The district court found it necessary to conclude that Guantanamo is a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Rasul v. Myers“each territory and possession of the United States,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rasul v. Myers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.