Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 433 MASS 149 - Commonwealth v. Milo M.

Commonwealth v. Milo M.’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Commonwealth v. Hamilton (2011), Commonwealth v. Walters (2015)

25 state decisions

140200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cuyler v. Sullivan · United States v. Lopez · Brewer v. Williams · New Jersey v. T. L. O. · Watts v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If complaint is made to any such court or justice that a person has threatened to commit a crime against the person or property of another, such court or justice shall examine the complainant and any witnesses who may be produced, on oath, reduce the complaint to writing and cause it to be subscribed by the complainant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the legal framework in which facts are to be found is not generally stated with the precision and amplitude of instructions to a jury [and] it is presumed that the judge as trier of fact applies correct legal principles”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an expression of intention to inflict a crime on another and an ability to do so in circumstances that would justify apprehension on the part of the recipient of the threat.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.