Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 433 MASS 406 - Commonwealth v. Lopez

Commonwealth v. Lopez’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. St. Pierre · Commonwealth v. Willie · Commonwealth v. Neal · Commonwealth v. Blaikie · Commonwealth v. DiBenedetto

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Paint smears taken from a screwdriver found in the defendant’s truck matched the paint on the automobile in which the body was found. Fibers consistent with those from the victim’s multicolored shorts were found in the defendant’s truck, and black fibers consistent with the truck’s carpet were found on the victim’s sandals. In addition, the defendant’s black pants contained stains of iron and rust, white paint chips, and red fibers consistent with those from the victim’s hooded shirt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Merely introducing another possible suspect, without substantial admissible evidence that this person, and not the defendant, may have committed the crimes, does not warrant a new trial. Here, the possibility of Garcia as an alternate suspect was presented to some extent at trial, and rejected by the jury. The little additional and generalized information contained in the defendant’s postconviction affidavits casts no real doubt on the validity of the jury’s verdicts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a substantial risk that, [if] the jury [were] exposed to [the Garcia-Kojak] evidence, [it] would have reached a different conclusion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.