Lopez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Frederick Road Ltd. Partnership v. Sturm · Barbre v. Pope · Robinson v. State · Gleaton v. State · State v. D'ONOFRIO
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Laches derives from concerns similar to those that undergird statutes of limitations. Both devices - one a product of legislation, the other a development of the common law - are intended to set time limits on the assertion of claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.