Moser v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2011
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Griffiths v. State · 177 Ind. App. 450 - Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Cable Brazil, Inc. · Lawson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“receiving of cable television signals was receiving something of value, whether a service, or signal, or a combination thereof, from someone who had a possessory intent in it”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McGraw“[plroperty in the criminal sense is ... anything of value; and includes ... personal property, money, labor, and services.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Edwards v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.