State v. Skramstad’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2012
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Merrill · State v. Jones · State v. Pieschke · State v. Bettin · State v. Rainer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the maximum sentence possible at the time of conviction, not the sentence which was actually given nor any subsequent alteration of the defendant’s record”). But even assuming arguendo that Skramstad was correcdy decided on its facts, it is of no aid to the State here, since the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Notwithstanding a conviction is for a felony: ... (2) the conviction is deemed to be for a misdemeanor if the imposition of the prison sentence is stayed, the defendant is placed on probation, and the defendant is thereafter discharged without a prison sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Coleman“one [criminal history] point for every felony conviction * * * for which a stay of imposition of sentence was given * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.