Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 433 N.W.2d 765 - State v. Ailts

State v. Ailts’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 1991
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Edwards · State v. Lundeen · Manning v. Engelkes · State v. Swallom

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he State is entitled to the same judicial impartiality and fairness as any other litigant in our courts ... Justice requires ‘a fair opportunity for each side to present its case must be afforded.’ [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.