Baker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1981
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 82 Okla. Crim. 5 - Bingham v. State · 73 Okla. Crim. 370 - Johnson v. State · 2 Okla. Crim. 136 - Marshall v. Territory · Mitts v. State · French v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is also apparent, under the statute quoted, that the defendant’s rights may be protected either at the commencement of the trial or before the entry of judgment and sentence. In either case, the defendant’s right to a jury trial is predicated upon the trial judge’s doubt as to the issue of present sanity.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Fox v. State · Tims v. State“•‘When an indictment or information is called for trial, or upon conviction the defendant is brought up for judgment, if a doubt arise as to the sanity of the defendant, the court must order a jury to be impaneled from the jurors summoned and returned for the term, or who may be summoned by direction of the court, to inquire into the fact.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Koonce v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.