Jarchow v. Eder’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 1998
2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 295 Ill. App. 504 - Nelson v. Richardson · Knupp v. Hubbard · Kokenge v. Holthaus · Moore v. Dunham · St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Taliaferro
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * Since this statute [§ 98] was obviously intended only to protect and preserve a right for the plaintiff which might, by reason of the defendant’s absence, have been impossible or impracticable for him to enforce, justice would not seem to require that the statute be applied to give him an advantage when the disability has been effectively removed by other statutory provisions “To permit the plaintiff in a case such as this to defer the commencement of his cause of action for an indefinite period of time, when there is continuously open to him the right to commence a personal action against the defendant, would frequently result in hardship to the defendant, who might often be completely unaware of his position of peril.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wright v. Keiser““. . . ‘the majority, and we think the better reasoned' view, holds that provisions for substituted service of process upon a state official arising out of motor accidents within the- state has the effect of nullifying any statute suspending the period of limitations . . .’” Jarchow v. Eder, Okl., 433 P.2d 942, 945 (1967)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tarter v. Insco““We know of no good reason why the Legislature would intend to apply a different rule to a non-resident motorist defendant than to a resident motorist defendant who leaves the state or conceals himself inside the state so that service of process with due diligence cannot be obtained against him,””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Keller v. Crase
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.