433 Pa. Super. 94 - Grunde v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 381 Pa. Super. 155 - Pride Contracting, Inc. v. Biehn Construction, Inc. · 404 Pa. Super. 384 - Steinfurth v. LaManna · 423 Pa. Super. 121 - Clinger v. Tilley · 426 Pa. Super. 127 - West v. Andersen · 374 Pa. Super. 405 - Weist v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the nature and severity of the discovery violation; (2) the defaulting party’s willfulness or bad faith; (3) prejudice to the opposing party; (4) the ability to cure the prejudice; and (5) the importance of the precluded evidence in light of the failure to comply.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.