Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 433 So. 2d 104 - State v. Square

433 So. 2d 104 - State v. Square’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

688
cited by 688 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

684 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 688 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato (1992), State v. Bradford (1997)

684 state decisions

30201983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Brady v. State of Maryland · Chimel v. California · United States v. Agurs · Swain v. State of Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 688 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whoever commits the crime of armed robbery shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not less than ten years and for not more than ninety-nine years, without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he state and the defendant shall have the right before argument to submit to the court special written charges for the jury.... A requested special charge shall be given by the court if it does not require qualification, limitation, or explanation, and if it is wholly correct and pertinent....”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “22. Armed Robbery Guilty. Guilty of simple robbery. Guilty of attempted simple robbery. Not guilty.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.