Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 433 So. 2d 110 - State v. Germain

433 So. 2d 110 - State v. Germain’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
3
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably 436 So. 2d 475 - State v. Kahey (1983), 637 So. 2d 1012 - State v. Davis (1994)

79 state decisions

3101983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Rhode Island v. Innis · North Carolina v. Butler · 277 So. 2d 126 - State v. Prieur

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ny inculpatory evidence is 'prejudicial' to a defendant, especially when it is 'probative' to a high degree.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`§ 446. Evidence where knowledge or intent is material and where offense is one of a system When knowledge or intent forms an essential part of the inquiry, testimony may be offered of such acts, conduct or declarations of the accused as tend to establish such knowledge or intent and where the offense is one of a system, evidence is admissible to prove the continuity of the offense, and the commission of similar offenses for the purpose of showing guilty knowledge and intent, but not to prove the offense charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The ruling of a trial court with respect to the admissibility of allegedly gruesome photographs will be disturbed only if the prejudicial effect of the photographs clearly outweighs their probative value. State v. Tonubbee, 420 So.2d 126, 133 (La.1982); State v. Landry, 388 So.2d 699, 703 (La. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 968 , 101 S.Ct. 1487 , 67 L.Ed.2d 618 (1981).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.