Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 433 SO2D 508 - Spaziano v. State

Spaziano v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2016 · most notably Spaziano v. Florida (1984), 136 S. Ct. 616 - Hurst v. Florida (2016)

2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

1301983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Furman v. Georgia · Gardner v. Florida · Proffitt v. Florida · Blanton v. General Electric Credit Corp. · Bullington v. Missouri

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he jury's function under the Florida death penalty statute is advisory only.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “meets the clear and convincing test to allow override of the jury's recommendation in accordance with . . . Tedder v. State, 322 So.2d 908 (Fla.1975).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “After all, Spaziano was known as `Crazy Joe.' When he was 20 years old he was involved in a serious accident. Ever since then he has not been `normal.' The jury could well find that he was entitled to the statutory mental mitigating factors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.