Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 433 SO2D 51 - Neil v. State

Neil v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 1985
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Witherspoon v. Illinois · Swain v. State of Alabama · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Taylor v. Louisiana · 22 Cal. 3d 258 - People v. Wheeler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Absent the criteria established in Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 , 85 S.Ct. 824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965), may a party be required to state the basis for the exercise of a peremptory challenge?”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]hen peremptory challenges are subjected to judicial scrutiny, they will no longer be peremptory.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.