433 So. 2d 959 - Cork v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2017
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Oregon v. Mathiason · Texas v. Certain Named & Unnamed Undocumented Alien Children · People v. Howard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State · Fox v. State“traditional investigatory functions (such) as general on-the-scene questioning.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"As opposed to anyone else, including the actual owner, he had control of the [vehicle] at the time in question. 'Possession of keys to a locked container may be enough to vest in the possessor control over the contents of the container.' People v. Peters , 43 A.D.2d 599 , 348 N.Y.S.2d 786 , 789 (1973). See also Christopher v. State , 639 S.W.2d 932 , 935 (Tex.Cr.App. 1982). Here, the defendant's recent use of the [vehicle] and his possession of the key provide sufficient evidence of his control of the [vehicle] and knowledge of the stolen property contained inside."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Berry v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.