433 So. 2d 96 - State v. Stokes’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 1991
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · 391 So. 2d 421 - State v. Gibson · 418 So. 2d 515 - State v. Smith · 419 So. 2d 939 - State v. Stucke · 420 So. 2d 126 - State v. Tonubbee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. The period of limitation established by Article 578 shall be interrupted if: (1) The defendant at any time, with the purpose to avoid detection, apprehension, or prosecution, flees from the state, is outside the state, or is absent from his usual place of abode within the state; or (2) The defendant cannot be tried because of insanity or because his presence for trial cannot be obtained by legal process, or for any other cause beyond the control of the state; or (3) The defendant fails to appear at any proceeding pursuant to actual notice, proof of which appears of record. B. The periods of limitation established by Article 578 shall commence to run anew from the date the cause of interruption no longer exists.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gauthe“"Sources of information presented no substantial problem with ordinary business records. All participants, including the observer or participant furnishing the information to be recorded, were acting routinely, under a duty of accuracy, with employer reliance on the result, or in short `in the regular course of business.' If, however the supplier of the information does not act in the regular course, an essential link is broken; the assurance of accuracy is of no avail. An illustration is the police report incorporating information obtained from a bystander: the officer qualifies as acting in the regular course but the informant does not."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“problem associated with the business record exception. The Court noted the reliability problems as expressed in Advisory Committee Notes of the Proposed Federal Rules of Evidence:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.