State v. Todd’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2018
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on New York Stock Exchange v. Legate · Caudle v. United States · State v. Naylor · State v. Amsden · State v. Stidham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That statute [§ 27.030] was obviously intended primarily, if not exclusively, to cover the institution and trial of criminal cases, and proceedings before grand ju- ríes. The Attorney General is expressly given the management of all appeals and writs of error to which the State is a party ... The Attorney General is the chief legal officer of the State; actually, the various offices of the prosecuting attorneys are ‘carved out of’ this overriding authority, with local implications.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Steffen · State v. Rall
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.