Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 434 A2D 377 - Hicks v. State

Hicks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2020

11 state decisions

4019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Faretta v. California · Gideon v. Wainwright · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Illinois v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]nless it is based on clearly unreasonable or capricious grounds, a discretionary ruling on a motion for continuance will not be disturbed by this Court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.