Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 434 A2D 57 - State v. Arnold

State v. Arnold’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 1993
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pauling v. McElroy · State v. Casale · United States v. Johnson · State v. O'Clair · Jones v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not enough for the defendant to show that there is a possibility or a ehance of a different verdict. ‘[I]t must be made to appear that, in light of the overall testimony, new and old, another jury ought to give a different verdict; there must be a ‘probability that a new trial would result in a different verdict.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.