Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 434 F.3d 461 - Ciminillo v. Streicher

Ciminillo v. Streicher’s Empirical Analysis

434 F.3d 461 · 2006

Citation profile

204
cited by 204 later decisions
May 2025
most recently cited

42 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 204 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n (2008), Burgess v. Fischer (2013)

42 federal appellate ·

1400200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Terry v. Ohio · Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor · City of Canton v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 204 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must establish that: 1) the City's training program was inadequate for the tasks that officers must perform; 2) the inadequacy was the result of the City's deliberate indifference; and 3) the inadequacy was closely related to or actually caused the injury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]lleged conduct that does not implicate a constitutional right protected by another amendment will be analyzed under the substantive due process component of the Fourteenth Amendment”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “do not constitute an exhaustive list; the ultimate question is 'whether the totality of the circumstances justifies a particular sort of seizure.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.