Barham v. Ramsey’s Empirical Analysis
434 F.3d 565 · 2006
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 38 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably Fogarty v. Gallegos (2008), Pitt v. District of Columbia (2007)
14 federal appellate · 38 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“case law addressing large-scale demonstration scenarios does not suspend — or even qualify — the normal operation of the Fourth Amendment probable cause requirements. Rather this case law merely amplifies one essential premise ...: when compelling circumstances are present, the police may be justified in detaining an undifferentiated crowd of protesters, but only after providing a lawful order to disperse followed by a reasonable opportunity to comply with that order.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Richardson v. Sauls“No person shall fail or refuse to comply with any lawful order or direction of any police officer ... invested by law with authority to direct, control, or regulate traffic.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.