Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 434 F.3d 639 - Nutraquest Inc v. Md

Nutraquest Inc v. Md’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
June 2020
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 10 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably In re W.R. Grace & Co. (2012), In Re Tribune Co. (2011)

2 federal appellate · 10 district ·

330200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Protective Committee for Independent Stockholders of TMT Trailer Ferry, Inc. v. Anderson · Zale Corporation Feld v. Zale Corporation · Tringali v. Hathaway Machinery Co. · Louisiana World Exposition, Inc. v. Federal Insurance · Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]o find an abuse of discretion the District Court’s decision must rest on 'a clearly erroneous finding of fact, an errant conclusion of law or an improper application of law to fact.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “On motion by the trustee and after notice and a hearing, the court may approve a compromise or settlement. Notice shall be given to creditors, the United States trustee, the debtor and indenture trustees as provided in Rule 2002 and to any other entity as the court may direct.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) the probability of success in litigation; (2) the likely difficulties in collection; (3) the complexity of the litigation involved, and the expense, inconvenience and delay necessarily attending it; and (4) the paramount interest of the creditors.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.