Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 434 F.3d 826 - Burrell v. Henderson

Burrell v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis

434 F.3d 826 · 2006

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
August 2020
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Thompson v. Bell (2009), Frontier Insurance v. Blaty (2006)

8 federal appellate ·

120200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Invst Financial Group, Inc. v. Chem-Nuclear Systems, Inc. · United Coin Meter Company Inc v. Seaboard Coastline Railroad · Good Wwa v. Ohio Edison Company · Thompson v. American Home Assurance Co. · Waifersong, Ltd. v. Classic Music Vending

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On motion and upon such terms as are just, the Court may relieve a party or a party’s legal representative from a final judgment, order or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect; ... (4) the judgment is void; ... or (6) any other reason that justifies relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.