Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 434 F.3d 92 - United States v. Hansen

United States v. Hansen’s Empirical Analysis

434 F.3d 92 · 2006

Citation profile

66
cited by 66 later decisions
4
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 8 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably United States v. Baker (2008), United States v. Muñoz-Franco (2007)

42 federal appellate · 8 district · 4 state decisions

360200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1623 · 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Crawford v. Washington · Pinkerton v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “criminally liable for the substantive offenses committed by his co-conspirators during the course of and in furtherance of the conspiracy,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “extensive discretion over the phrasing of questions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) an error occurred (2) which was clear or obvious and which not only (3) affected the defendant's substantial rights, but also (4) seriously impaired the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.