Chengjun Wu v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Shabanali Ladha v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Gui v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · BURBANO · Manimbao v. Ashcroft · Soto-Olarte v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“clarified” the IUD was put in “the ‘second time’ ” “after she ‘went back to the hospital’ ” because she was in pain from the abortion. Id. The IJ, however, interpreted the word”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.