Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 434 FSUPP 1177 - Almeida v. Chang

Almeida v. Chang’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 1988
most recently cited

1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Goldberg v. Kelly · Feld v. Berger · Barrett v. Roberts · Harrell v. Harder · Burlingame v. Schmidt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) “Timely” means that the notice is mailed at least 10 days before the date of action, that is, the date upon which the action would become effective.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.