Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 434 NW2D 406 - State v. Conger

State v. Conger’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 2022

2 state decisions

1019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Colorado v. Connelly · Culombe v. Connecticut · Arizona v. Mauro · State v. Cullison · State v. Duncan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If 'substantial evidence is presented to support each alternative method of committing a single crime, and the alternatives are not repugnant to each other, then unanimity of the jury as to the mode of commission of the crime is not required.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “These subparagraphs clearly define alternative conduct that in a single occurrence can result in only one conviction of a crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “are consistent with and not repugnant to each other.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.