Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 434 NW2D 43 - State v. Stuck

State v. Stuck’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2020

24 state decisions

12019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gerstein v. Pugh · Caldwell v. Mississippi · Frisbie v. Collins · Griffin v. State · State v. Sahlie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) The request must be made in good faith; 2) the request must be reasonable in all respects; 3) the request[ ] must be timely and set forth reasons which seem to make such services needed or necessary to the defendant; and 4) the request must specify that the defendant is financially unable to obtain the required service himself and that such services would otherwise be justifiably obtained if the defendant were financially able.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “‘ An admission is not limited to words, but may also include the demeanor, conduct and acts of the person charged with a crime. Further, a criminal admission is ‘avowal of a fact or of circumstances from which guilt may be inferred....’ Admissions are ‘the words or acts of a party-opponent, or of his predecessor or representative, offered as evidence against him.’ (citations omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[ T]he request must be (1) in good faith; (2) reasonable in all respects; (3) timely and specifically set forth the necessity of an expert; and (4) clear in that defendant is financially unable to obtain the required service himself and that such service would otherwise be justifiably obtained were the defendant financially able.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.