Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 434 NW2D 747 - State v. Lowther

State v. Lowther’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2021

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

11019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Mabry v. Johnson · Michigan v. Clifford · United States v. Griffin · United States v. Buettner-Janusch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]rders are required to be in writing because the trial court may change its ruling before the order is signed and entered. [4] For this reason, unrecorded rulings on motions are ineffective and need not be considered at a later date.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The prosecution shall dispose of all criminal cases by plea of guilty or nolo contendere, trial or dismissal within one hundred eighty days from the date the defendant has first appeared before a judicial officer on the complaint or indictment. Any period of delay shall be excluded if the trial court finds good cause for the delay. In the event of the prosecution's failure to dispose of the action within the time limit required by this section, the action shall be dismissed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts is inadmissible in a criminal prosecution to establish the impermissible inference that since the defendant committed a similar offense on another occasion, he has a propensity to commit the crime charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.