State v. Jenner’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2010
3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. United States · Commissioner v. Engle · B.D. International Discount Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. · Carstea v. Poplar Tree Homeowners Ass'n · United States v. Monton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our standard of review on denial of this motion is whether the State made out a prima facie case from which the jury could reasonably find the defendant guilty. Sufficiency of trial evidence rests on whether the evidence, if believed by the jury, is sufficient to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In making such determination, this court will accept evidence and the most favorable inferences that can be fairly drawn from that evidence which will support the guilty verdict. (Citations omitted).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Goodroad · State v. Phyle“To cause the type of prejudice that prevents co-defendants from obtaining a fair trial, the defenses must be more than merely antagonistic. They must conflict to the point of being irreconcilable and mutually exclusive so that acceptance of one defendant's defense will preclude the acquittal of the other defendant.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Shape · State v. Zakaria“[a] certain amount of prejudice to a defendant is regarded as acceptable given the judicial economies that result from joinder.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Shape · State v. Zakaria
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.