Graham v. Graham’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2015
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In Re Miller's Estate · Jones v. Cabaniss · Schulte v. Hatcher · Osage Implement Company v. Bottrell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[A]n application to disqualify a judge in a civil proceeding on the grounds of prejudice or bias is addressed to the trial court’s sound discretion, whose ruling thereon will not be reversed on appeal, unless a clear abuse of discretion appears.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“was authorized to proceed by mandamus or to present his defense and preserve his rights throughout the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Pierce v. Pierce
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.