Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently November 2006
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · 56 Wash. 2d 846 - State v. Baker · 230 Pa. Super. 563 - Commonwealth v. Kloch · 231 So. 2d 779 - Strode v. State · Halko v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“revealed Williams had considerably more than .10 percent alcohol content in his blood, the statutory demarcation between a presumption of whether Williams was driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“authorizes the arrest of a person for driving while intoxicated in certain circumstances even though the officer first discovers the offender after the vehicle has come to rest.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he basis for the requirement that the offense be committed in the presence of the arrestor is to avoid mistake.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.