434 So. 2d 740 - Armstead v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 1991
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hagler v. Gilliland · Maslankowski v. Beam Ex Rel. Quernemeon · Rosen v. Lawson · Salotti v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co. · Nettles v. Bishop
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[H]is opinion on this important aspect was not based upon facts within his own knowledge or upon a hypothetical question, but was based partly upon the opinion of another and used for a hearsay purpose. That is, the witness himself would have to have believed it to be true in order to reach his opinion based upon it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[W]hen a witness is duly qualified as an expert, . . . then he may base his opinion upon either facts of which he has firsthand knowledge or facts, in evidence, which are assumed in a hypothetical question asked of him. His opinion must be based upon facts and not upon opinions or conclusions of others.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.