Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 434 S.W.2d 694 - Pendleton v. State

Pendleton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
1
states following
March 2001
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently March 2001 · most notably Olson v. State (1969), Peach v. State (1973)

2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

19019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Denham v. State · Smith v. State · Tarwater v. State · Randel v. State · 154 Tex. Crim. 422 - Richardson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"And the District Judges may exchange districts, or hold courts for each other when they deem it expedient, and shall do so when required by law."”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Herrod v. State · Ex Parte Lowery
  2. ““Three elements are necessary to constitute the offense of unlawfully passing as true a forged instrument. These are (a) the passing of the instrument as true, (b) the fact that the instrument was a forgery, and (c) knowledge by the accused that the instrument was forged or constituted a forgery when he passed it. 3 Branch’s Anno.P.C.2d Ed., Sec. 1611, p. 761; Montgomery v. State, 157 Tex.Cr.R. 44 , 246 S.W.2d 209 ; Tarwater v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 59 , 267 S.W.2d 410 . These elements may be proved, however, by either direct or circumstantial evidence. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Mendoza v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.