Ciulla v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1995
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Katz v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas · Brinegar v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The objections made to the introduction into evidence of the results of the second search required that the State produce evidence sufficient to satisfy the court that the search was made under the authority of a search warrant, valid on its face, or to show by evidence, as a condition precedent to the admission of the marijuana, that such evidence was lawfully obtained. Lee v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 608 , 322 S.W.2d 260 (1958); Brown v. State, 166 Tex.Cr.R. 322 , 313 S.W.2d 297 (1958); Gomez v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 469 , 293 S.W.2d 657 (1956); Sampson v. State, 160 Tex.Cr.R. 302 , 268 S.W.2d 661 (1953).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ortega v. State““A minor has the same constitutional right to be secure in his person from all unreasonable seizures as has an adult. The 14th Amendment and the Bill of Rights protect minors as well as adults. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 , 87 S.Ct. 1428 , [ 18 L.Ed.2d 527 ] (1967); Continental Casualty Co. v. Miller, 135 S.W.2d 501 (Waco Civ.App.1940, n. w. h.).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mercer v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.