Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 434 SW3D 424 - Steele v. State

Steele v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
March 2026
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Walley v. State · Bunch v. State · 91 Ark. App. 86 - LeFever v. State · 2013 Ark. App. 375 - Hoodenpyle v. State · Hinton v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A person commits distributing, possessing, or viewing of matter depicting sexually explicit conduct involving a child if the person knowingly: ■ (1) Receives for the purpose of selling or knowingly sells, procures, manufactures, gives, provides, lends, trades, mails, delivers, transfers, publishes, distributes, circulates, disseminates, presents, exhibits, advertises, offers, or agrees to offer through any means, including the Internet, any photograph, film, videotape, computer program or ' file, video game, or any other reproduction or reconstruction that depicts a child or incorporates the image of a child engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or ■ (2) Possesses or views through any means,- including on the Internet, any photograph, film, videotape, computer program or file, computer-generated image, video game, or any other reproduction that depicts a child or incorporates the image of a child engaging in sexually explicit conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In cases involving constructive possession of child pornography on a computer, where joint access is alleged, the Eighth Circuit has required “ownership, dominion or control over the [pornographic material] itself, or dominion over the premises in which the [pornographic material] is concealed.” See, e.g., United States v. Acosta, 619 F.3d 956, 961 (8th Cir.2010) (alteration' in original) (citation omitted).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.