Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 434 U.S. 77 - Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. J Kowalski

Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. J Kowalski’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

290
cited by 290 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

102 federal appellate · 9 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 290 later decisions (11 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably Rowan Cos. v. United States (1981), HCSC-Laundry v. United States (1981)

102 federal appellate · 9 district · 18 state decisions

1690197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedSaunders v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (from Third Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 119 · 26 U.S.C. § 162 · 26 U.S.C. § 61 (Payment-in-Kind Tax Treatment Act of 1983) · 37 U.S.C. § 101 (Armed Forces Enlisted Personnel Bonus Revision Act of 1974)

Relies on Helvering v. Clifford · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Glenshaw Glass Company · Eisner v. Macomber · United States v. Correll · Helvering v. Winmill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 290 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items: (1) Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, and similar items....”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “* * * [Arguments of equity have little force in construing the boundaries of exclusions and deductions from income many of which, to be administrable, must be arbitrary. * * *”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “all gains except those specifically exempted.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.