State v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
March 2006
most recently cited
1 district · 16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Arizona v. Washington · United States v. Josef Perez · State v. Lagasse · State v. Linscott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“THE COURT: Welcome back. I have received a note from the Foreman to the affect that you are still deadlocked. Is this so? You have given it a try, you have gone back and you have tried to reconsider your positions in light of the positions of the others and you are still unable to reach unanimity? I take it from this that there is no possibility of reaching a unanimous decision without compressing or violating standards; your positions are such that there is no way to resolve the differences. Is my understanding correct? THE FOREMAN: Yes. THE COURT: Very well, your failure to reach a decision compels me to declare that there is a manifest necessity that I declare a mistrial and I do declare a mistrial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.