Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 435 A2D 54 - Jones v. Brawner Co.

Jones v. Brawner Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2013

13 state decisions

501981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morris v. Breaker · Kaiser v. Rapley · Moody v. Winchester Management Corp. · Craig v. Heil · Jack Spicer Real Estate, Inc. v. Gassaway

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A landlord may recover possession of a rental unit where the tenant is violating an obligation of his or her tenancy and fails to correct such violation within 30 days after receiving from the landlord a notice to correct such violation or vacate. [Emphasis added.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Every notice to the tenant to quit shall be served in English and Spanish upon him personally, if he can be found, and if he cannot be found it shall be sufficient service of said notice to deliver the same to some person of proper age upon the premises, and in the absence of such tenant or person to post the same in some conspicuous place upon the leased premises. If the notice is posted on the premises, a copy of the notice shall be mailed first class U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to the premises sought to be recovered, in the name of the person known to be in possession of the premises, or if unknown, in the name of the person occupying the premises, within three calendar days of the date of posting.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the provisions of the regulation did not supplant the notice requirements specified in the previously enacted § 45-906. The two were to be read harmoniously.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.